Hardware Trouble

We spent a fair share of the last couple of days trying to sort out the hardware we are going to need to shoot the documentary.

In the end, we settled on the Canon Rebel T2i as the main video camera. We should receive one of these tomorrow. We also wanted to have another Canon camera for redundancy but it turns out the camera (bought on eBay) is broken. I hadn’t taken 10 pictures with it before it fell apart. The piece of glass in-between the mirror and the viewfinder literally fell off.

This is the second camera breaking down on me in two weeks. I’m hoping our luck will turn soon.

By the way, I know Martin already blogged about it, but the Local Mission Eatery is my favorite restaurant in San Francisco so far!

Posted in camera gear | Leave a comment

Feeling at Home @ the Local Mission Eatery

Another splendid evening, at the Local Mission Eatery. This venue is charming, modest, and food is exceptional. If this was home, we’d be in heaven.

 

Chilling @ the Local Mission Eatery, SF

Chilling @ the Local Mission Eatery, SF

 

Marc Olivier, Muscadet, Loire, 2009 (white)

  • fresh, a tad of lemon, acid, very enjoyable
  • 3/5

Valli Unite, Bianchino, Cortese, Piedmont, 2009 (white)

  • color: yellow
  • cheese on the nose
  • long finish, with some cereal at the very end
  • 3/5 (strong)

Paul Mathew, Pinot Noir, Dry Creek, 2008 (red)

  • alcohol on the nose
  • sweet red berries, alcohol, nice typical pinot noir flavors
  • 3/5

Indica, Mendocino, 2008 (red)

  • very closed, only a whiff of alcohol on the nose
  • nothing serious to detect, dull wine, totally disappointing
  • 1/5 , eh. Next!

Broc cellars, Syrah, Bennet Valley, 2006 (red)

  • rubber, tomato, pepper on the nose
  • tannins, bitterness on the finish
  • 3/5

Schlumberger, Merlot, Dry Creek, 2006 (red)

  • sniff of alcohol, lots of substance, tannins
  • if you can disregard the alcohol (which is too strong), then it feels like you are chewing on the grape must, which is really enjoyable!
  • 3/5
Posted in San Francisco, wine tasting | Leave a comment

Generous Wine Tasting @ Arlequin

Tonight was a detour to Arlequin.

 

Wine tasting menu @ Arlequin, SF

Wine tasting menu @ Arlequin, SF

 

Chard., Broadsite ‘James Berry’ Paso Robles 2009 (white)

  • round, creamy, acid, a little sweet, delicious!
  • 3/5

Sky Vineyards Rose of zinfandel Mt Veeder Napa Valley 2009 (rose)

  • Glimpse of raspberry on the nose
  • Waterish, rose petals, too delicate
  • 2/5

Morgon Gamay Noir, Marcel Lapierre, 2008 (red)

  • leather, pepper, cognac
  • Pepper on mid-palate, surprising late finish of pepperish beetroots
  • very interesting, incredibly long
  • 3/5
Posted in San Francisco, wine tasting | 1 Comment

Educative Natural Wine Tasting @ Barbacco

What a night! 9 incredible wine tastings tonight @ Barbacco! Charming and very knowledgeable Gretchen was very generous of her time and gave us valuable wine descriptions. She even gave us 2 free tastings from Oregon!

 

2 whites, 2 oranges lined up @ Barbacco, SF

2 white, 2 orange lined up @ Barbacco, SF

 

Poco a Poco, Chard., Mendocino, 2009 (white)

  • Demeter-certified
  • pale orange color
  • non-filtered, and we could see some particles
  • apple, melon on the nose
  • full-bodied, present, round, filling, very enjoyable
  • 4/5

Scholium Project, Verdelho, Chalk Hill region, Marcher sur la Lune, 2008 (white)

  • butter scotch, very round, little acidity
  • caramel, sugar, oaky, creamy
  • 4/5

NPA, Pinot Gris, Chalk Hill, 2009 (orange)

  • glue, alcohol, melon, strawberry
  • acid, yeast, filling, twizzler
  • 3/5 strong

NPA, Sauv. Blanc, Chalk Hill (orange)

  • strong litchi, melon, grandma’s hard candy
  • papaya, five alive juice, grapefruit, peach
  • peach notes on the finish
  • 3/5 strong

Peter Paul, Pinot Noir, Russian River, 2008 (red)

  • raspberry, red berries
  • wonderful bitterness on mid-palate
  • fill the mouth with flavor, not so long, and extremely interesting!
  • 4/5 (strong)

NPA, blend, Mendocino, 2009 (red)

  • strong cassis, blackberries, strong glue on the nose
  • not mature yet, tannic but nothing else, prompt, glue
  • 2/5

Poco a Poco, zinfandel, Russian River, 2008 (red)

  • close to a typical Pinot Noir on the nose, red berries
  • short, no tannins, very closed
  • 2/5

Cowhorn, Grenache 74, Applegate Valley, OR, 2008 (red)

  • raspberry, little glue
  • “Raspberry juice for adults”, tannic
  • Concentrate of grapes, with no complexity
  • Mart: 3/5, Matt: 4/5

Cowhorn, Spiral 36, Applegate Valley, OR (red)

  • Demeter-certified
  • apple, herbaceous
  • very very acid, melon
  • 3/5
Posted in San Francisco, wine tasting | Leave a comment

Cable Car Approaching on California St.

 

Cable car approaching on California St.

Cable car approaching on California St.

 

Posted in nightlife, San Francisco | Leave a comment

Poll: Ever Tasted a Natural Wine?

Posted in poll | 1 Comment

Plenty of Natural Wines @ Heart

Wine tasting tonight was at Heart, in the Mission District, SF. Really nice joint. Modern but casual. Check out the pictures on their website: they are representative of the place!

 

Mason jars for wine tasting @ Heart, SF

 

De Moor, Bourgogne Chitry, Chard., 2007 (white)

  • very light, shy, herbaceous, acid.
  • 2/5

Valli Unite brut & beast frizzante, 2008 (white)

  • light, hay, acid
  • 3/5

Valli Unite Bianchino (white)

  • delicious ripe apricot on the nose
  • herbaceous, bitter, acid
  • 3/5

Bregeon Muscadet Reserve sur Lie, 2002 (white)

  • Pear on the nose, acid in the mouth
  • 3/5

Occhipinti SP68, 2009 (red)

  • nose: velvet, warm and strawberry
  • mouth: delicious and surprising. Full of fruit. Enjoyable!
  • 4/5

Paolo Bea San Valentino Umbria Rosso, 2006 (red)

  • Medium-bodied, light in texture, hay, taste of rice
  • 3/5

Chateau Bellevue Lussac St-Emilion (red)

  • Strawberry, tannic.
  • 3/5
Posted in San Francisco, wine tasting | Leave a comment

Disappointing Night @ Amelie

RDV in Embarcadero quarters tonight. We were excited to try Amelie, this French-staffed joint, but we were disappointed by a bunch of details.

 

Amelie's door entrance

Amelie's door entrance

 

We got our tastings in small and clunky table glasses, certainly not made for tasting, which made it very hard to swirl the wine in order to allow it to breathe.

And let’s be fair: the food was good. We had 3 different cheeses with warm bread. Seems like Amelie couldn’t get it right though: 1 of the 3 cheeses was not the one we ordered.

Chard. Baileyana, Edna Valley, 2007 (white)

  • waterish, too light, without personality
  • 2/5

Amelie, Malbec, Beaucanon Estate, Napa Valley, 2005 (red)

  • pepper, hot chili, grapes, alcohol
  • lacks the roundness you would expect for a Malbec of this age
  • 2/5

Cab. Sauv. + Syrah, OPC Buoncristiani proprietary, Napa Valley, 2006 (red)

  • impossible to say anything because it was oxydated, probably because the wine had remained in the open bottle for too long
Posted in San Francisco, wine tasting | Leave a comment

The Official Fourteen Point Manifesto on Natural Wine by Joe Dressner

Joe Dressner, a natural wine importer, wrote a nice piece a few weeks ago about natural wine.

1. Hold your wallet tight when someone tells you they love “Natural Wine.” All of a sudden it is popular to say you are making natural wines, that you are drinking natural wines, that you just love natural wines. Wines come in bottles, not slogans, and unless you are talking about actual growers, vintages or vineyards, you are blowing hot air. The Natural Wine Movement hates all sloganeering and please leave us out of your exhortations.

2. Years ago I asked a clerk at Brooks Brothers how to tie a bow-tie. She patiently answered that a Gentleman either knew how to tie a bow-tie or did not know how to tie a bow-tie. The same applies to Natural Wine. If you have to ask what Natural Wine is then please reintroduce yourself to the flavors, smells and textures of nature. The Natural Wine Movement can help you, but you must do most of this work yourself.

3. The Natural Wine Movement is not a movement with a leader, credo and principles. If you think there is a Natural Wine Movement sweeping the world, triumphantly slaying industrial wineries and taking no hostages, then you are one delusional wine drinker. The Natural Wine Movement thinks that you might want to lessen your alcohol consumption for a few months.

4. But wouldn’t life be simpler if we had just one big category of natural wine to direct the poor consumer who is faced with so many baffling options? The Natural Wine Movement believes that wine is complicated and turning wine into neat categories is what made America and Madison Avenue great, but not what makes one Romorantin taste better than another Poulsard. And that doesn’t even leave room for Counoise and Pinot Fin. Broad categories are great for soda, juice, low carbon footprint beverages, eating and drinking locally and romance novels. Leave Natural Wine alone.

5. The poor consumers facing so many baffling choices are not really so confused. They need to learn how to trust and explore their tastes. If they like crappy industrial wine, why slap them around? Let them learn and go with their instincts, eventually they will come around. The pointists and tasting notes crowd are obscurantists who wants them to believe it takes the training of a brain surgeon to appreciate wine. The Natural Wine Movement believes everyone has the right to drink and eat badly, to watch horrible movies, read crappy books and watch CSI Las Vegas, CSI Miami or CSI New York. Forensic evidence tells us that wine drinkers can mature and blossom and find nuance more charming than the world of Awesome and Mind Blowing!

6. Jules Chauvet used to say being determines consciousness. The Natural Wine Movement doe not expect the Wine Industrial Complex to be won over to natural fermentation, low sulphur and what-have-you. Even if it were, it would still be making unfathomable, undrinkable stuff. Stop condemning the Parkers, Rollands, Eisenmeyers, Wine Spectators, Cult Wineries with 16 Degree swill, Southern Wine & Spirits and the Andre Tamers of the world (actually, Andre Tamer is a very good importer of Spanish wine but I have a grudge against him, with good reason, and threw his name in here for no other particular reason). Honestly, they live in another world than we do.

7. Please leave us alone. Great natural wine is made in small quantities and there will never be enough to go around. Industrial Wine can satisfy thirst, I suppose, as can water, diet Sprite, Tomato Juice from local farmers and Gatorade. If everyone jumps on the natural wine bandwagon there will be a tendency to get bigger to satisfy demand and quality will be compromised. We will be overwhelmed by corporate types who want to cash in on the next big thing. We’ll have to form a new movement and find a new vague concept that hipsters all over the world will embrace (like Real Wine). The Natural Wine Movement likes to drink in peace and doesn’t want to become a marketing scheme for bloggers, wineries, retailers, distributors, importers with brain cancer, journalists and virtual reality television shows. We like being marginal.

8. The Natural Wine Movement abhors earnestness. Please don’t tell us your stories about leading a sulphur-free life and how wild yeast fermentation made you kinder to your loved ones and pets. Humorless activism to promote wine is an oxymoron. Getting smashed, eating well, and laughing with good friends are key to our movement. We actively campaign for the drinking age to be lowered to sixteen-year-old, like in good old France. We also enjoy being contemptuous of other people around us, somewhat randomly, particularly when we are on the second or third bottle.

9. Another thing we dislike is self-importance. The wine milieu is saturated with so many very important people it makes the mind dizzy. The Wine Spectator even organizes events for the very important to meet their very important peers from all around the world. The Natural Wine Movement does not attend these conferences. We don’t go to the Miami, Aspen, Boston, Denver, Houston, Phoenix, Elmira or Washington Wine Week Celebration. We’re not important enough to attend and don’t want to become that important.

10. Sure, there are big shots even in our marginal milieu. Certain vignerons, certain importers, certain restaurateurs and certain major private drinkers. We do our best to rotate big shots, searching as far as the former Czechoslovakia for media darlings. We’re a democratic group based on the French principles of Liberté, Fraternité et Copinage! The Natural Wine Movement knows no lider maximo and is dedicated to the notion that we can all be René Mosse for one day! By the way, I’m not sure what Copinage means, but it sounds good.

11. Is there really a difference between Natural, Biodynamic, Real and Organic wines? There sure is, but is it really productive to blab about the differences? We like mystery and suspense and so do you or you wouldn’t be glued to your television sets watching CSI New York. The Natural Wine Movement hates precision, detail and facts. For instance, when someone asks a member of The Natural Wine Movement for the exact variety composition of a blend, we just make up some percentages. Often they don’t add up to 100% because no one really cares. We don’t care and you don’t care. If the terroir is expressive then the grape varieties are transparent. We are not in California.

12. So, can you make natural wine in the New World? Maybe and we’d love to try some examples. No doubt there are great sites and we’re confident that our colleagues in the New World will find their way over the next few decades and centuries. Planting the right variety on the right root stock and not having all those unsightly clones would be a good start. The Natural Wine Movement salutes the courage and audacity of our New World brethren.

13. Doesn’t this make us a bunch of fascists who want to dictate taste to everyone else? Not really, The Natural Wine Movement doesn’t look for converts. If you want to hang around with us, that’s wonderful, but we’re just nice people looking for a nice buzz. Ever meet Olivier Lemasson – I can’t imagine a softer-spoken, nicer guy. He has two young kids to feed and buying a case of Olivier’s wine would be of great assistance to him.

14. Who appointed me to speak for The Natural Wine Movement, you ask? I seized control three years ago in an epic battle with François Ecco and Arnaud Erhart. Since then, I have been the official public spokesman for me, myself and I.

Posted in natural wine | 2 Comments

What is Natural Wine?

This is obviously a crucial question for us, so we looked for answers everywhere. We found out that there is no simple definition of what natural wine is, but there are several elements which we keep on reading or hearing while discussing with people.

Here is a fair take from Jon Bonné, in an article in the San Francisco Chronicle:

A quick, imperfect answer: Natural wine isn’t as simple as organic or biodynamic. As with food, there’s no official decree. Yes, sustainable farming (potentially organic or biodynamic) is a departure point, but natural wine concerns itself more with what happens next.

For instance: only indigenous yeasts to ferment the wine; no additions (sugar, acid, yeast nutrients) with the possible exception of sulfur dioxide; no manipulation using technologies like reverse osmosis. Get as close as possible to putting in the bottle exactly what the vineyard gave – a goal that potentially takes the line “great wine is made in the vineyard” and shunts it back to pre-cliche significance.

Remy Charest, in his tribute to Marcel Lapierre, defines it succinctly as:

organic in the vineyard, and wild yeast fermentations with nothing taken out and nothing added in, including SO2.

The article on Wikipedia has it like this:

Natural wine is wine made with as little chemical and technological intervention as possible, either in the way the grapes are grown or the way they are made into wine. The term is used to distinguish such wine from organic wine. Organic wine is organic in the sense of having been produced made from organically grown grapes, but it may be subject to technical manipulation in the winemaking process.

Additionally, the requirements for natural wine are as follows:

  • Hand-picked, organically or biodynamically grown grapes.
  • Low-yielding vineyards.
  • No added sugars, no foreign yeasts.
  • No fining or filtration.
  • No adjustments for acidity.
  • No other additives for mouth-feel, colour, etc.
  • No micro-oxygenation or reverse osmosis.
  • Little or no added sulphite.
Posted in natural wine, project evolution | Leave a comment